Alberta’s NDP Opposition is calling on the government to provide the public a full breakdown of costs incurred by a committee tasked with analyzing the province’s supervised consumption sites, after documents revealed panelists
were repeatedly warned about “excessive” and “unreasonable” spending.
Internal emails obtained by Postmedia demonstrated a mounting level of frustration among civil servants as committee members
went more than $10,000 over budget
for travel, meal and accommodation costs.
In a letter sent Monday to Jason Luan, associate minister of mental health and addictions, NDP MLA Heather Sweet called it “unacceptable for a panel you tasked with denying healthcare to the most vulnerable Albertans to charge these excessive and unreasonable luxuries to the Alberta taxpayer.”
“Officials from Alberta Health repeatedly warned your appointed panel members to bring their spending into line with Treasury Board and Finance policy, apparently without success,” wrote Sweet, the Opposition critic for mental health and addictions.
“I am concerned that your office was either unaware of these abuses, or failed to intervene.”
In August 2019, Luan approved a budget of approximately $61,200 for travel and accommodation (including meals), $111,300 for town hall-related costs and $202,500 for honoraria, totalling $375,000,
obtained by Postmedia.
Luan’s office said the eight-member committee came under budget overall at $305,000, but confirmed $72,000 was spent for travel and accommodation — $10,800 more than originally allocated.
Luan
released the findings of the panel’s review
in March, describing a “system of chaos” at supervised consumption sites across the province.
It is the height of hypocrisy for the UCP to close ARCHES in Lethbridge, an organization that saved Alberta lives, for misuse of public funds while approving expenses that were a flagrant misuse of public funds. https://t.co/3OTVY8G8ec pic.twitter.com/7jaFy5ejgl
— Heather Sweet (@heathersweetab) August 31, 2020
The correspondence surrounding the panel’s spending ended Nov. 22 last year and it’s unclear what expense claims were filed after that date.
Civil servants repeatedly reminded committee members about travel and expense policies, “unreasonable” claims, and the need to publicly disclose expenses, but some committee members seemingly ignored those warnings.
“Unfortunately, the documents released . . . do not present a complete picture of your panel’s mismanagement,” Sweet wrote Monday in a letter to Luan, which was also sent to Finance Minister Travis Toews.
“I ask you to provide a full accounting of the Supervised Consumption Services Review Committee and table that document in the legislature, so that Albertans may judge for themselves if you are a competent steward of their tax dollars or not.”
Related
- ‘Disgusting abuse of taxpayer money’: UCP-appointed panel exceeds travel budget by thousands
- Harm reduction advocates send open letter to province protesting Lethbridge SCS closure
- ‘A system of chaos’: Supervised consumption site review finds ‘serious problems’ with operations
- UCP pulls funding to Lethbridge supervised consumption site following audit
- U of C study finds supervised consumption sites could save Alberta government money
Emails between provincial staff expressed concern about panel members routinely overspending on meals. Recurring “excessive” meals included prime rib dinners, avocado toast and a “special” with creme brûlée and wine.
Questions also surrounded an alleged claim of $3,500 “more than entitled” on travel expenses by committee vice-chair Geri Bemister-Williams.
Provincial employees questioned Bemister-Williams potentially “double-dipping” regarding a travel claim in emails which referenced a round-trip drive from Duncan, B.C., to Calgary — roughly 2,100 kilometres. Staff commented that there were “huge issues with the claim.”
Sweet raised concern that the province
in late July to its
, which “makes decisions on applications pertaining to admission, competence and administration of treatment for people under the Mental Health Act.”
“This position frequently involves travel expenses, and Albertans have a right to know that appointees understand and respect their responsibilities to the taxpayer,” Sweet wrote.
She added it was also “the height of hypocrisy” for the UCP government to pull its funding for Lethbridge’s only supervised drug consumption site, for which it cited a misuse of public funds, “while you yourself approved expenses that were a flagrant misuse of public funds.”
The site, run by the AIDS Outreach Community Harm Reduction Education Support Society (ARCHES),
marked its final day of operations on Monday
after the UCP government stripped its funding in July. The announcement came after an audit
found more than $1.6 million in unaccounted funds
and other “misappropriated” public money at the site.
It’s disgusting that associate minister Luan has closed the busiest harm-reduction facility in North America — which was saving lives — over what he asserts as a misuse of taxpayer money, even while he was approving expenses for his own panel,” said Sweet #ableg https://t.co/HNsvPXkaAh
— Heather Sweet (@heathersweetab) August 31, 2020
“You have documented proof of inappropriate spending on the SCS Review Committee. Not only have you failed to properly review them, but you have failed to release them to the public,” Sweet wrote to Luan.
“These are Alberta taxpayers’ dollars, Minister, and you were entrusted with managing them responsibly. Charging the taxpayer with personal road trips, steak dinners, prime rib, creme brulee, and avocado toast are clear abuses of public funds.”
A spokesperson for Luan’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter.
—With files from Alanna Smith
Twitter:
Prohibida la reproducción parcial o total. Todos los derechos reservados de Rubicon, Global Trade, Customs & Business Partnership, S.C., del Autor y/o Propietario original de la publicación. El contenido del presente artículo y/o cualquier otro artículo, texto, boletín, noticia y/o contenido digital, entre otros, ya sea propio o de tercero alguno, publicado en nuestra página de internet u otros medios digitales, no constituye una consulta particular y por lo tanto Rubicon, Global Trade, Customs & Business Partnership, S.C., sus colaboradores, socios, directivos y su autor, no asumen responsabilidad alguna de la interpretación o aplicación que el lector o destinatario le pueda dar.